Preskoči na sadržaj

2025

Reproducibility of scientific career paths over time

brown tower clock

Photo source: Murray Campbell (@murrayc) | Unsplash

Klara Filek, a postdoctoral researcher at the Medical University of Graz, recently wrote an article about career orientation for young scientists for the Penkala Association blog. She makes many great points through the article, and I heartily recommend reading it, especially to current PhD students seeking future opportunities.

I would like to emphasize the two reasons that she mentioned why career guidance is so difficult in Croatian academia (translation mine):

  • Limited experience of the mentors: Many mentors rely on their own experience in a system they are part of and know very well, and outside of which they often cannot help us much (depending, of course, on the field and personal affinities).
  • The “academia-only” narrative: Continuing higher education and a doctorate seem to presuppose a postdoc position and a teaching career. In addition, a good number of academics I was (and still am) surrounded by are convinced that academia is the only place where you can be creative and flexible, which is not true and makes it difficult to explore other possibilities.

I thought quite a bit about both of these points, given that I am guiding Matea Turalija through her PhD journey and I am eager to help her with my acquired experience as much as I can. However, as Klara explained above, this is far from a trivial endeavor.

Cross-building and cross-testing GROMACS for Windows on Linux with MinGW and Wine


opened brown wooden window

Photo source: Katerina (@kat_katerina) | Unsplash


GROMACS 2025.1 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.15006630) bugfix release came out on Tuesday with a few bugfixes. Among them is a fix for energy correction map (CMAP) parsing code, a feature which I introduced in 2025 release in preparation for adding a converted version of Amber ff19SB force field (doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00591) to GROMACS.

The fix for the issue also added several tests to avoid future regressions. I like developing free and open-source software in general and GROMACS in particular; it feels a lot like the postdoc years in Heidelberg again. However, that was not the only change I proposed that got merged for the bugfix release.

The unfortunate state of early-career scientist funding in Croatia


euro banknote collection on wooden surface

Photo source: Markus Spiske (@markusspiske) | Unsplash


Over the last couple of weeks, there has been a lot of discussion about scientific research funding in the US. There are many changes, and it remains to be seen what will come out of it in the end. If some of the new policies stick around for a longer time, I have no doubt they will inspire discussions and considerations in the rest of the world, including Europe, as many of them in the US tend to do.

While science funding in the US is an important and interesting topic, I would like to say a couple of words regarding science funding that hits closer to home, namely in Croatia. Earlier this week, the Croatian Science Foundation (HrZZ) closed the project call for Installation Research Projects UIP-2025-02. This was the first project call of this type after 5 years, which is possibly the reason why the usual range of eligible scientists with a maximum of 7 years after obtaining the PhD degree was extended to a maximum of 10 years after it. The call still requires a minimum of 2 years of experience after the degree.